Adding a nonreflecting weakly compact set

DOI10.1215/00294527-2019-0014OpenAlexW3100673258WikidataQ127772590 ScholiaQ127772590MaRDI QIDQ2330509

Brent M. Cody

Publication date: 22 October 2019

Published in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04358

zbMATH Keywords

reflectionweak compactnessindescribabilityEaston-support iteration

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Consistency and independence results (03E35) Large cardinals (03E55) Other combinatorial set theory (03E05)

Related Items

Generalisations of stationarity, closed and unboundedness, and of Jensen's \(\square\), Higher indescribability and derived topologies, Characterizations of the weakly compact ideal on \(P_\kappa\lambda\), Forcing a \(\square(\kappa)\)-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal, The weakly compact reflection principle need not imply a high order of weak compactness

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Reflection and indescribability in the constructible universe
• The consistency strength of ``every stationary set reflects
• Stationary cardinals
• The weakly compact reflection principle need not imply a high order of weak compactness
• Orders of indescribable sets
• Iterated Forcing and Elementary Embeddings
• Ideals and Generic Elementary Embeddings
• Saturation of the Closed Unbounded Filter on the Set of Regular Cardinals
• Indescribable cardinals and elementary embeddings
• On splitting stationary subsets of large cardinals
• Saturated ideals
• Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals
• Saturation of the weakly compact ideal
• The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy