Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2338102
DOI10.1007/s00184-019-00719-4zbMath1454.62099OpenAlexW2947853834WikidataQ127808281 ScholiaQ127808281MaRDI QIDQ2338102
Publication date: 20 November 2019
Published in: Metrika (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-019-00719-4
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing
- Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
- Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
- Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
- A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions
- Estimating ordered binomial proportions with the use of group testing
- Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions
- An Empirical Bayes Group-Testing Approach to Estimating Small Proportions
- APPLICATIONS OF LIKELIHOOD RATIO ORDER IN BAYESIAN INFERENCES
- Informative Retesting
- ON A METHOD OF ESTIMATING FREQUENCIES
This page was built for publication: Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing