Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2353975
DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.010zbMath1316.68150OpenAlexW2063837957MaRDI QIDQ2353975
Publication date: 10 July 2015
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.010
Related Items (13)
On Supported Inference and Extension Selection in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks ⋮ Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses ⋮ Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic ⋮ Taking into account ``who said what in abstract argumentation: complexity results ⋮ Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments ⋮ Constrained Value-Based Argumentation Framework ⋮ The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation ⋮ Integrating individual preferences into collective argumentation ⋮ A multi attack argumentation framework ⋮ What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics? ⋮ Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences ⋮ A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- A logic for default reasoning
- Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Towards a Formal Framework for the Search of a Consensus Between Autonomous Agents
- Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
This page was built for publication: Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
