Floating conclusions and zombie paths: Two deep difficulties in the ``directly skeptical approach to defeasible inheritance nets

Related Items (22)

On Stein's paper: Resolving ambiguity in nonmonotonic inheritance hierarchies ⋮ Making the right exceptions ⋮ Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach ⋮ Adaptive logic characterizations of input/output logic ⋮ Adaptively applying modus ponens in conditional logics of normality ⋮ Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation ⋮ A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness ⋮ Defeasible inheritance with doubt index and its axiomatic characterization ⋮ A First Order Logic Benchmark for Defeasible Reasoning Tool Profiling ⋮ Well-founded semantics for defeasible logic ⋮ Defeasible inheritance on cyclic networks ⋮ Abstract argumentation systems ⋮ Explaining default intuitions using maximum entropy. ⋮ SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics ⋮ Self-stabilizing defeat status computation: dealing with conflict management in multi-agent systems ⋮ Netl and subsequent path-based inheritance theories ⋮ A conditional logic for abduction ⋮ Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification ⋮ Skepticism and floating conclusions ⋮ How we designed winning algorithms for abstract argumentation and which insight we attained ⋮ The carneades model of argument and burden of proof ⋮ Interdefinability of defeasible logic and logic programming under the well-founded semantics

Cites Work

This page was built for publication: Floating conclusions and zombie paths: Two deep difficulties in the ``directly skeptical approach to defeasible inheritance nets