How optimally foraging predators promote prey coexistence in a variable environment
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2399074
DOI10.1016/j.tpb.2016.12.003zbMath1369.92104OpenAlexW2563575635WikidataQ46442585 ScholiaQ46442585MaRDI QIDQ2399074
Peter L. Chesson, Simon Maccracken Stump
Publication date: 21 August 2017
Published in: Theoretical Population Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2016.12.003
coexistenceapparent competitionstorage effectoptimal foraging theoryannual plant modeltype II functional response
Related Items
When do factors promoting genetic diversity also promote population persistence? A demographic perspective on Gillespie's SAS-CFF model ⋮ Population games with instantaneous behavior and the Rosenzweig-MacArthur model
Cites Work
- Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis
- Persistence in fluctuating environments
- The relative importance of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect in the lottery model
- Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations
- A stochastic foraging model with predator training effects: I. Functional response, switching, and run lengths
- Multispecies competition in variable environments
- Interacting coexistence mechanisms in annual plant communities: frequency-dependent predation and the storage effect
- Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics
- Variation in moisture duration as a driver of coexistence by the storage effect in desert annual plants
- A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code
- The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities
This page was built for publication: How optimally foraging predators promote prey coexistence in a variable environment
