Some comments on Ian Rumfitt's bilateralism
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2410887
DOI10.1007/s10992-016-9395-9zbMath1417.03080OpenAlexW2274140465MaRDI QIDQ2410887
Publication date: 19 October 2017
Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/14480/1/RumfittComments.pdf
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Classical propositional logic (03B05) Subsystems of classical logic (including intuitionistic logic) (03B20)
Related Items (9)
A more general general proof theory ⋮ Reprint of: ``A more general general proof theory ⋮ Bilateralism does not provide a proof theoretic treatment of classical logic (for technical reasons) ⋮ Logical multilateralism ⋮ Introduction: Bilateralism and Proof-Theoretic Semantics (Part I) ⋮ Introduction: Bilateralism and Proof-Theoretic Semantics (Part II) ⋮ Fractional-Valued Modal Logic and Soft Bilateralism ⋮ Bilateral Rules as Complex Rules ⋮ Harmony and Normalisation in Bilateral Logic
Cites Work
This page was built for publication: Some comments on Ian Rumfitt's bilateralism
