Well-defined steady-state response does not imply CICS

DOI10.1016/j.sysconle.2006.02.001zbMath1100.93025OpenAlexW2127340456MaRDI QIDQ2433408

E. P. Ryan

Publication date: 27 October 2006

Published in: Systems \& Control Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2006.02.001

zbMATH Keywords

global attractivityhomoclinic orbitsasymptotically autonomous systemsstep response

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Asymptotic stability in control theory (93D20) Control/observation systems governed by ordinary differential equations (93C15)

Related Items (6)

On zero-input stability inheritance for time-varying systems with decaying-to-zero input power ⋮ A Small-Gain Theorem for Random Dynamical Systems with Inputs and Outputs ⋮ Nonrobustness of asymptotic stability of impulsive systems with inputs ⋮ The converging-input converging-state property for Lur'e systems ⋮ Input-to-state stability for cascade systems with multiple invariant sets ⋮ Tracking control of Wiener models with hierarchical and switching model predictive control

Cites Work

• Global attractivity, I/O monotone small-gain theorems, and biological delay systems
• Convergence results and a Poincaré-Bendixson trichotomy for asymptotically autonomous differential equations
• Asymptotically autonomous differential equations in the plane
• Nonautonomous systems: Asymptotic behaviour and weak invariance principles.
• Asymptotically Autonomous Semiflows: Chain Recurrence and Lyapunov Functions
• Monotone control systems
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Well-defined steady-state response does not imply CICS