Decisions with conflicting and imprecise information

DOI10.1007/s00355-012-0691-1zbMath1288.91044OpenAlexW1973311745MaRDI QIDQ2453431

Jean-Christophe Vergnaud, Thibault Gajdos

Publication date: 6 June 2014

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27005/

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Related Items

The ex ante aggregation of opinions under uncertainty ⋮ Aggregation of experts' opinions and conditional consensus opinion by the Steiner point ⋮ Smooth aggregation of Bayesian experts ⋮ Separate aggregation of beliefs and values under ambiguity

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Aggregation of multiple prior opinions
• Decision making with imprecise probabilistic information
• Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: Insurers' attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates
• Attitude toward imprecise information
• Representation and aggregation of preferences under uncertainty
• Consensus for belief functions and related uncertainty measures
• Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
• On the use of capacities in modeling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion
• Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. With comments, and a rejoinder by the authors
• The aggregation of imprecise probabilities
• Consistent Bayesian aggregation
• When does aggregation reduce risk aversion?
• The Opinion Pool
• Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools
• Decision Analysis Expert Use
• Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian Approach
• The ex ante aggregation of opinions under uncertainty
• Generalizing the conjunction rule for aggregating conflicting expert opinions