The consistency argument for ranking functions

DOI10.1007/s11225-007-9062-9zbMath1124.03001OpenAlexW2006888076MaRDI QIDQ2454646

Franz Huber

Publication date: 16 October 2007

Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10848/1/new_version.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

RevisionProbability MeasuresConditional ConsistencyConditionalizationDeductive ClosureDutch Book ArgumentRanking FunctionsSpohnUpdate Rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Probability and inductive logic (03B48)

Related Items

A Survey of Ranking Theory, Why follow the royal rule?, What should I believe about what would have been the case?, On de Finetti's instrumentalist philosophy of probability, New foundations for counterfactuals, COMPLETENESS FOR COUNTER-DOXA CONDITIONALS – USING RANKING SEMANTICS, Defeasible normative reasoning

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
• Conditionalization and observation
• What are degrees of belief?
• Ranking functions and rankings on languages
• On Spohn's rule for revision of beliefs
• De Finetti, Countable Additivity, Consistency and Coherence
• A Survey of Ranking Theory
• Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?
• Coherence and the axioms of confirmation