Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2461597
DOI10.1007/s11166-007-9018-5zbMath1151.91407OpenAlexW2059134591MaRDI QIDQ2461597
Geoffrey R. Gerdes, Trudy Ann Cameron, Daniel R. Burghart
Publication date: 28 November 2007
Published in: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-007-9018-5
Failure riskWillingness to payInattentionR\&D benefitsRedundancy riskScenario adjustmentStated preferences
Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics (62P05) Public goods (91B18) Individual preferences (91B08)
Cites Work
- Estimating stated preferences with rated-pair data: Environmental, health, and employment effects of energy programs
- Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparison to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach
- Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation.
- Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: Application to global climate change using national internet samples.
- Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: Are the underlying preferences the same?
- Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency
- Climate change adaptation: A study of fuel choice and consumption in the US energy sector
- Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting
- Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics*
This page was built for publication: Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention
