A note on Lindley's paradox
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2474778
DOI10.1007/BF02595421zbMath1142.62011MaRDI QIDQ2474778
Publication date: 6 March 2008
Published in: Test (Search for Journal in Brave)
Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Bayesian inference (62F15) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)
Related Items (9)
Importance of the prior mass for agreement between frequentist and Bayesian approaches in the two-sided test ⋮ Equivalence between the posterior distribution of the likelihood ratio and a \(p\)-value in an invariant frame ⋮ Test, estimation and model comparison for the meiosis I nondisjunction fraction in trisomies ⋮ Test procedures based on combination of Bayesian evidences for \(H_{0}\) ⋮ Power estimation for testing normal means ⋮ Bayesian and Classical Approaches for Hypotheses Testing in Trisomies ⋮ Assessing post-data weight of evidence ⋮ A new Bayesian procedure for testing point null hypotheses ⋮ Irreconcilability of P-value and Bayesian measure in two-sided hypothesis: Pareto distribution with the presence of nuisance parameter
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Estimation of accuracy in testing
- Comparison of the \(p\)-value and posterior probability
- Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
- Reconciling Bayesian and frequentist evidence in the point null testing problem
- Assessing post-data weight of evidence
- Bayes factor in testing precise hypotheses
- A STATISTICAL PARADOX
- A comment on D. V. Lindley's statistical paradox
- Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentist Evidence in the One-Sided Testing Problem
- Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
- Lower Bounds on Bayes Factors for Interval Null Hypotheses
- Lindley's Paradox
- A SUITABLE BAYESIAN APPROACH IN TESTING POINT NULL HYPOTHESIS: SOME EXAMPLES REVISITED
- Calibration ofρValues for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses
- Power estimation for testing normal means
This page was built for publication: A note on Lindley's paradox