Quantal-response equilibrium models of the ultimatum bargaining game
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2485485
DOI10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00051-4zbMath1099.91031WikidataQ59540676 ScholiaQ59540676MaRDI QIDQ2485485
Publication date: 5 August 2005
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Noncooperative games (91A10) Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Experimental studies (91A90)
Related Items
Quantal response methods for equilibrium selection in \(2\times 2\) coordination games ⋮ Quantal response methods for equilibrium selection in normal form games ⋮ Gambler's fallacy and imperfect best response in legislative bargaining ⋮ Evolution and the ultimatum game ⋮ Understanding perpetual R\&D races ⋮ Behavioral influences on strategic interactions outcomes in game theory models ⋮ Do sellers offer menus of contracts to separate buyer types? An experimental test of adverse selection theory
Cites Work
- Detecting failures of backward induction: Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining
- A backward induction experiment
- Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions
- Quantal response equilibria for extensive form games
- A laboratory investigation of multiperson rationality and presentation effects
- Boundedly rational Nash equilibrium: A probabilistic choice approach
- Evidence on the equivalence of the strategic and extensive form representation of games.
- Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game
- Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term
- Quantal response equilibria for normal form games
- Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- Learning in High Stakes Ultimatum Games: An Experiment in the Slovak Republic
- Minimum-effort coordination games: Stochastic potential and logit equilibrium
- Ultimatum bargaining behavior in Israel, Japan, Slovenia, and the United States: A social utility analysis