Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments. III: A form for the psychophysical function and intensity filtering
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2495490
DOI10.1016/j.jmp.2005.11.005zbMath1139.91379OpenAlexW1966211589WikidataQ55953102 ScholiaQ55953102MaRDI QIDQ2495490
Ragnar Steingrimsson, R. Duncan Luce
Publication date: 30 June 2006
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2005.11.005
matchingpower functionpsychophysicsratio estimationratio productionmagnitude productionauditory summationintensity filteringmultiplicative invarianceproduction commutativity
Related Items
Evaluating decision maker ``type under \(p\)-additive utility representations, Torgerson's conjecture and Luce's magnitude production representation imply an empirically false property, Theory and tests of the conjoint commutativity axiom for additive conjoint measurement, A re-examination of the algebraic properties of the AHP as a ratio-scaling technique, Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: theory and evidence, Measurement analogies: comparisons of behavioral and physical measures, Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments. IV : Forms for the weighting function, What are we estimating when we fit Stevens' power law?, Subjective intensity: behavioral laws, numerical representations, and behavioral predictions in Luce's model of global psychophysics, The psychophysical function and separable model forms in joint magnitude estimation, Human psychophysical functions, an update: methods for identifying their form; estimating their parameters; and evaluating the effects of important predictors, Note on a changed empirical inference in several steingrimsson and Luce articles due to C.T. Ng's correction of an error in Luce (2004), Measurement by subjective estimation: Testing for separable representations
Uses Software
Cites Work
