How Bayesian analysis cracked the red-state, blue-state problem

DOI10.1214/13-STS458zbMath1332.62426arXiv1405.4687MaRDI QIDQ254358

Andrew Gelman

Publication date: 8 March 2016

Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4687

zbMATH Keywords

votingpolitical sciencesparse datamultilevel regression and poststratification (MRP)sample surveys

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25) Bayesian inference (62F15) Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Voting theory (91B12) History, political science (91F10) Mathematical geography and demography (91D20)

Related Items (5)

Spatio-temporal modeling of traffic accidents incidence on urban road networks based on an explicit network triangulation ⋮ Spatial modeling of brain connectivity data via latent distance models with nodes clustering ⋮ Naive method to test the convergence of simulation and its applications in the computation of bankruptcy probability ⋮ Probabilistic reanalysis of storm surge extremes in Europe ⋮ Systematic Bayesian posterior analysis guided by Kullback-Leibler divergence facilitates hypothesis formation

Cites Work

• Post-Stratification: A Modeler's Perspective

This page was built for publication: How Bayesian analysis cracked the red-state, blue-state problem