On the Birnbaum argument for the strong likelihood principle

DOI10.1214/13-STS457zbMath1332.62025arXiv1302.7021MaRDI QIDQ257686

Deborah G. Mayo

Publication date: 17 March 2016

Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.7021

zbMATH Keywords

sampling theorysufficiencyBirnbaumizationlikelihood principle (weak and strong)weak conditionality

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Sufficient statistics and fields (62B05)

Related Items (6)

New two-sided confidence intervals for binomial inference derived using Walley's imprecise posterior likelihood as a test statistic ⋮ Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective ⋮ False confidence, non-additive beliefs, and valid statistical inference ⋮ Interpreting \(p\)-values and confidence intervals using well-calibrated null preference priors ⋮ Blending Bayesian and Classical Tools to Define Optimal Sample-Size-Dependent Significance Levels ⋮ Discussion of ``On the Birnbaum argument for the strong likelihood principle

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• What does the proof of Birnbaum's theorem prove?
• Some Problems Connected with Statistical Inference
• On the Foundations of Statistical Inference
• On principles and arguments to likelihood
• Sufficiency and conditionality
• Testing Statistical Hypotheses
• Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction
• More on Concepts of Statistical Evidence
• The case for objective Bayesian analysis

This page was built for publication: On the Birnbaum argument for the strong likelihood principle