Euclidean dynamical triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really 1st order?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2635399
DOI10.1007/JHEP05(2015)138zbMath1388.83142arXiv1311.4712OpenAlexW2158210273MaRDI QIDQ2635399
Philippe de Forcrand, Tobias Rindlisbacher
Publication date: 31 May 2018
Published in: Journal of High Energy Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.4712
Quantization of the gravitational field (83C45) Lattice gravity, Regge calculus and other discrete methods in general relativity and gravitational theory (83C27)
Related Items (3)
Exploring Euclidean dynamical triangulations with a non-trivial measure term ⋮ Erratum to: Continuum interpretation of the dynamical-triangulation formulation of quantum Einstein gravity ⋮ Quantum gravity from causal dynamical triangulations: a review
Cites Work
- Continuum interpretation of the dynamical-triangulation formulation of quantum Einstein gravity
- Euclidian 4d quantum gravity with a non-trivial measure term
- P.l. homeomorphic manifolds are equivalent by elementary shellings
- Appearance of mother universe and singular vertices in random geometries
- Phase diagram of the mean field model of simplicial gravity
- Scaling in four-dimensional quantum gravity
- Monte Carlo simulations of 4d simplicial quantum gravity
- Feedback-optimized parallel tempering Monte Carlo
This page was built for publication: Euclidean dynamical triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really 1st order?
