Common randomness and distributed control: A counterexample
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2643484
DOI10.1016/j.sysconle.2007.03.010zbMath1118.93053OpenAlexW2016908727WikidataQ124802526 ScholiaQ124802526MaRDI QIDQ2643484
Vivek S. Borkar, Venkat Anantharam
Publication date: 23 August 2007
Published in: Systems \& Control Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2007.03.010
Noncooperative games (91A10) Stochastic learning and adaptive control (93E35) Stochastic systems in control theory (general) (93E03)
Related Items (5)
Geometry of information structures, strategic measures and associated stochastic control topologies ⋮ Convex Analysis in Decentralized Stochastic Control, Strategic Measures, and Optimal Solutions ⋮ Zero-sum games involving teams against teams: existence of equilibria, and comparison and regularity in information ⋮ Dynamic games among teams with delayed intra-team information sharing ⋮ A Universal Dynamic Program and Refined Existence Results for Decentralized Stochastic Control
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies
- On Sequences of Pairs of Dependent Random Variables
- Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality
- The common information of two dependent random variables
- A conditional entropy bound for a pair of discrete random variables
- Secret key agreement by public discussion from common information
- Approximation theory of output statistics
- Common randomness in information theory and cryptography. I. Secret sharing
- The common randomness capacity of a pair of independent discrete memoryless channels
- Common randomness in information theory and cryptography. II. CR capacity
- The common randomness capacity of a network of discrete memoryless channels
- Secret-key agreement over unauthenticated public channels-part I: definitions and a completeness result
This page was built for publication: Common randomness and distributed control: A counterexample