Can holistic declaration of preferences improve a negotiation offer scoring system?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2670538
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.008zbMath1495.90096OpenAlexW3207429747MaRDI QIDQ2670538
Tomasz Wachowicz, Ewa Roszkowska
Publication date: 11 March 2022
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.008
group decision and negotiationDRholistic judgmentsnegotiation offer scoring systemprenegotiation preparationUTA
Related Items (1)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Notes on order preservation and consistency in AHP
- Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions
- ACUTA: a novel method for eliciting additive value functions on the basis of holistic preference statements
- Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
- Expressiveness and robustness measures for the evaluation of an additive value function in multiple criteria preference disaggregation methods: an experimental analysis
- Heuristics for selecting pair-wise elicitation questions in multiple criteria choice problems
- A linear programming approach for learning non-monotonic additive value functions in multiple criteria decision aiding
- Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method
- On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations
- A review of some exchange algorithms for constructing discrete \(D\)-optimal designs
- Robust Ordinal Regression
- An analytic basis for decision support in negotiations
- Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation
- Web-Hipre: Global Decision Support By Value Tree And AHP Analysis
- Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience.
- Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods.
This page was built for publication: Can holistic declaration of preferences improve a negotiation offer scoring system?
