Fine-tuned vs. natural supersymmetry: what does the string landscape predict?

DOI10.1007/JHEP09(2022)125OpenAlexW4296186397MaRDI QIDQ2682160

Dakotah Martinez, Shadman Salam, Vernon Barger, Howard Baer

Publication date: 31 January 2023

Published in: Journal of High Energy Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14839

zbMATH Keywords

supersymmetrystring modelsstring and brane phenomenology

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantum theory (81-XX) Statistical mechanics, structure of matter (82-XX)

Uses Software

• ISAJet
• FlexibleSUSY

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Counting flux vacua
• Probing High-Scale and Split supersymmetry with Higgs mass measurements
• Split supersymmetry
• Aspects of split supersymmetry
• Non-canonical gauge coupling unification in high-scale supersymmetry breaking
• Supersymmetry, Ricci flat manifolds and the string landscape
• Addendum to: ``Moduli stabilisation and the statistics of SUSY breaking in the landscape
• Spread Supersymmetry
• Nothing is certain in string compactifications
• de Sitter vacua in string theory
• Flux compactification
• <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math>Theory Solution to the Hierarchy Problem
• THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUPERGRAVITY GRAND UNIFICATION: CIRCA 1982–1985
• Quantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant

This page was built for publication: Fine-tuned vs. natural supersymmetry: what does the string landscape predict?