Truthmaking and the is-ought gap

DOI10.1007/s11229-018-01996-8zbMath1506.03022OpenAlexW2900235842WikidataQ128947861 ScholiaQ128947861MaRDI QIDQ2693109

Kit Fine

Publication date: 17 March 2023

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01996-8

zbMATH Keywords

deontic logicobligationnaturalismHumetruthmaker semanticsis-ought gap

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (3)

How to prove Hume's law ⋮ The laws of thought and the laws of truth as two sides of one coin ⋮ Is, ought, and cut

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• The is-ought problem. An investigation in philosophical logic
• A theory of truthmaker content. II: Subject-matter, common content, remainder and ground

This page was built for publication: Truthmaking and the is-ought gap