Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_11OpenAlexW3207395054MaRDI QIDQ2695515

Antonio Yuste-Ginel, Andreas Herzig

Publication date: 31 March 2023

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_11

zbMATH Keywords

incomplete argumentation frameworkscontrol argumentation frameworksdynamic logic of propositional assignments

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logic in computer science (03B70)

Related Items (1)

On incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressiveness

Uses Software

• AFRA

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Persuasive argumentation and epistemic attitudes
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
• Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change
• Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments: A Well-Behaved Variant of PDL
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

This page was built for publication: Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic