Explanations of non-monotonic inference in admissibility-based abstract argumentation

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_12OpenAlexW3205884819MaRDI QIDQ2695516

Kristijonas Čyras, Timotheus Kampik

Publication date: 31 March 2023

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_12

zbMATH Keywords

non-monotonic reasoningformal argumentationexplainable artificial intelligence

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logic in computer science (03B70)

Uses Software

• Tweety

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Tweety
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• The degrees of monotony-dilemma in abstract argumentation
• Empirical study on human evaluation of complex argumentation frameworks
• Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
• On Explanations for Non-Acceptable Arguments
• Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics
• Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
• Abduction in argumentation frameworks
• Explanation Semantics for Abstract Argumentation
• Abstract argumentation and the rational man

This page was built for publication: Explanations of non-monotonic inference in admissibility-based abstract argumentation