Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_14OpenAlexW3206814076MaRDI QIDQ2695518

Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex

Publication date: 31 March 2023

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_14

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationhigher-order interactionslogical translationbipolar interactions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logic in computer science (03B70)

Uses Software

• AFRA

Cites Work

• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
• Argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks and evidence-based supports
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
• Fibring argumentation frames
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
• Structure-Based Semantics of Argumentation Frameworks with Higher-Order Attacks and Supports
• A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks