Forcing axioms via ground model interpretations
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2700805
DOI10.1016/j.apal.2023.103260OpenAlexW3211326867MaRDI QIDQ2700805
Christopher Henney-Turner, Philipp Schlicht
Publication date: 27 April 2023
Published in: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11781
Consistency and independence results (03E35) Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Other set-theoretic hypotheses and axioms (03E65) Generic absoluteness and forcing axioms (03E57)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I
- Forcing axioms and stationary sets
- The proper forcing axiom and stationary set reflection
- Bounded forcing axioms as principles of generic absoluteness
- KWithout the Measurable
- Nontame mouse from the failure of square at a singular strong limit cardinal
- Stationary reflection principles and two cardinal tree properties
- Jensen's diamond principle and its relatives
- Semiproper forcing axiom implies Martin maximum but not PFA+
- SUBCOMPLETE FORCING AND ℒ-FORCING
- Forcing closed unbounded sets
- A characterization of Martin's axiom in terms of absoluteness
- Singularizing successor cardinals by forcing
- SUBCOMPLETE FORCING, TREES, AND GENERIC ABSOLUTENESS
- ARONSZAJN TREE PRESERVATION AND BOUNDED FORCING AXIOMS
- Sufficient conditions for the forcing theorem, and turning proper classes into sets
This page was built for publication: Forcing axioms via ground model interpretations
