Historians and Philosophers of Logic: Are They Compatible? The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem as a Case Study

DOI10.1080/01445349950044125zbMath1052.03502OpenAlexW1981307807WikidataQ58499888 ScholiaQ58499888MaRDI QIDQ2757982

Gregory H. Moore

Publication date: 5 December 2001

Published in: History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01445349950044125

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03) History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55)

Related Items

What′s in a Name: Why Cauchy and Euler Share the Cauchy–Euler Equation ⋮ The notion of variable quantities \(\omega\) in Bolzano's early works ⋮ The emergence of open sets, closed sets, and limit points in analysis and topology

Cites Work

• A translation of Bolzano's paper on the intermediate value theorem
• Beyond first-order logic: the historical interplay between mathematical logic and axiomatic set theory
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item