A counterexample to a question of Bapat and Sunder

DOI10.13001/1081-3810.3178zbMath1332.15019OpenAlexW2281730717WikidataQ124804859 ScholiaQ124804859MaRDI QIDQ2794397

Stephen W. Drury

Publication date: 10 March 2016

Published in: The Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.13001/1081-3810.3178

zbMATH Keywords

Hadamard productpermanentOppenheim's inequality

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Determinants, permanents, traces, other special matrix functions (15A15)

Related Items (5)

An elementary proof of Chollet's permanent conjecture for \(4 \times 4\) real matrices ⋮ An update on a few permanent conjectures ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ A counterexample to a question of Bapat & Sunder ⋮ A simple counterexample for the permanent-on-top conjecture

Cites Work

• The permanent-on-top conjecture is false
• On majorization and Schur products
• A note on the analogue of Oppenheim's inequality for permanents
• Is There a Permanental Analogue to Oppenheim's Inequality?

This page was built for publication: A counterexample to a question of Bapat and Sunder