Which style of reasoning to choose in the face of conflicting information?

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXT030zbMath1444.03117OpenAlexW1977662060MaRDI QIDQ2804333

Peter Verdée, Christian Straßer, Joke Meheus

Publication date: 28 April 2016

Published in: Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/7251335

zbMATH Keywords

adaptive logicsdefeasible reasoningdynamic proofsmaximal consistent subsetsreasoning from inconsistent informationRescher-Manor consequences

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic in computer science (03B70) Paraconsistent logics (03B53)

Related Items (6)

Modular semantics for theories: an approach to paraconsistent reasoning ⋮ Adaptive logic characterizations of input/output logic ⋮ The inapplicability of (selected) paraconsistent logics ⋮ Preferential semantics using non-smooth preference relations ⋮ Adaptive Proofs for Networks of Partial Structures ⋮ A simple and non-trivial Ramsey test

This page was built for publication: Which style of reasoning to choose in the face of conflicting information?