Lexicographic beliefs and assumption

DOI10.1016/j.jet.2016.03.003zbMath1369.91026OpenAlexW2293184373MaRDI QIDQ281418

Eddie Dekel, Amanda Friedenberg, Marciano Siniscalchi

Publication date: 11 May 2016

Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2016.03.003

zbMATH Keywords

weak dominanceepistemic game theoryiterated admissibilityassumptionlexicographic probability systemsweak dominance in infinite games

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Noncooperative games (91A10) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26)

Related Items (12)

A characterization of Brandenburger-Friedenberg-Keisler's assumption ⋮ Strategic reasoning in persuasion games: an experiment ⋮ Weak belief and permissibility ⋮ Directed lexicographic rationalizability ⋮ Lexicographic probabilities and robustness ⋮ Common assumption of rationality ⋮ Lexicographic agreeing to disagree and perfect equilibrium ⋮ Cautious belief and iterated admissibility ⋮ Comprehensive rationalizability ⋮ Characterizing permissibility, proper rationalizability, and iterated admissibility by incomplete information ⋮ Algorithms for cautious reasoning in games ⋮ Strategic cautiousness as an expression of robustness to ambiguity

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Admissibility and assumption
• Lexicographic rationalizability and iterated admissibility
• Weak assumption and iterative admissibility
• Tremples in the Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games
• How proper is sequential equilibrium?
• Admissibility and common belief.
• Proper rationalizability in lexicographic beliefs
• Perfect equilibrium and lexicographic beliefs
• Preference-based belief operators
• Lexicographic Probabilities and Equilibrium Refinements
• Lexicographic Probabilities and Choice Under Uncertainty
• Admissibility in Games

This page was built for publication: Lexicographic beliefs and assumption