Lower Bounds on Blowing-Up Solutions of the Three-Dimensional Navier--Stokes Equations in $\dot H^{3/2}$, $\dot H^{5/2}$, and $\dot B^{5/2}_{2,1}$
DOI10.1137/15M1017776zbMath1344.35081arXiv1503.04323OpenAlexW2436744075MaRDI QIDQ2814475
James C. Robinson, David S. McCormick, Jose L. Rodrigo, Yi Zhou, Alejandro Vidal-López, Eric J. Olson
Publication date: 22 June 2016
Published in: SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.04323
Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids (76D05) Maximal functions, Littlewood-Paley theory (42B25) Sobolev spaces and other spaces of ``smooth functions, embedding theorems, trace theorems (46E35) Navier-Stokes equations (35Q30) Blow-up in context of PDEs (35B44)
Related Items (4)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Generalised Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities using weak Lebesgue spaces and BMO
- A local smoothness criterion for solutions of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations
- On the blow-up criterion of 3D Navier-Stokes equations
- Solutions for semilinear parabolic equations in \(L^ p\) and regularity of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes system
- Higher order commutator estimates and local existence for the non-resistive MHD equations and related models
- Lower bounds of potential blow-up solutions of the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in Ḣ32
- Lower bounds on blow up solutions of the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations in homogeneous Sobolev spaces
- Fourier Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations
- Commutator estimates and the euler and navier-stokes equations
- Remarques sur l’Existence Globale Pour le Système de Navier–Stokes Incompressible
- On the blow‐up criterion of the periodic incompressible fluids
- On lower bounds for possible blow-up solutions to the periodic Navier-Stokes equation
This page was built for publication: Lower Bounds on Blowing-Up Solutions of the Three-Dimensional Navier--Stokes Equations in $\dot H^{3/2}$, $\dot H^{5/2}$, and $\dot B^{5/2}_{2,1}$