The other side of ranking schemes: generating weights for specified outcomes

DOI10.1111/itor.12256zbMath1398.90063OpenAlexW2341339219MaRDI QIDQ2816367

Marie-Laure Bougnol, José H. Dulá

Publication date: 22 August 2016

Published in: International Transactions in Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12256

zbMATH Keywords

linear programminginteger programminghigher educationdata envelopment analysis (DEA)weight determinationuniversity rankings

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mixed integer programming (90C11) Linear programming (90C05) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (1)

A hybrid data envelopment analysis approach to analyse college graduation rate at higher education institutions

Uses Software

• CPLEX
• PCx

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis
• A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming
• Anchor points in DEA
• Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. A state-of- the-art survey
• Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
• Interior point methods in DEA to determine non-zero multiplier weights
• The Copeland method. I: Relationships and the dictionary
• Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights
• Mathematical Programming Models for the Determination of Attribute Weights
• PCx: an interior-point code for linear programming
• MACBETH — An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions

This page was built for publication: The other side of ranking schemes: generating weights for specified outcomes