A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-48758-8_9zbMath1483.68369OpenAlexW2544602510MaRDI QIDQ2835867

Stefano Bistarelli, Fabio Rossi, Francesco Santini

Publication date: 30 November 2016

Published in: Logics in Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48758-8_9

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Related Items (1)

A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
• Inconsistency tolerance.
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• A Common Computational Framework for Semiring-based Argumentation Systems
• Arguing with Valued Preference Relations
• Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks
• Semiring-based constraint satisfaction and optimization
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Extending Social Abstract Argumentation with Votes on Attacks

This page was built for publication: A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks