GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF BANKRUPTCY AND TAXATION PROBLEMS: RECENT ADVANCES
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2852568
DOI10.1142/S0219198913400185zbMath1275.91082DBLPjournals/igtr/Thomson13WikidataQ59972699 ScholiaQ59972699MaRDI QIDQ2852568
Publication date: 9 October 2013
Published in: International Game Theory Review (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cooperative games (91A12) Applications of game theory (91A80) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance (91-02) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Related Items (11)
A precedence constraint value revisited ⋮ On the Shapley value of liability games ⋮ A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Decentralization and mutual liability rules ⋮ NTU-bankruptcy problems: consistency and the relative adjustment principle ⋮ Proportional rules for state contingent claims ⋮ Proportionality, equality, and duality in bankruptcy problems with nontransferable utility ⋮ Bankruptcy games with nontransferable utility ⋮ Liability games ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update ⋮ From bargaining solutions to claims rules: a proportional approach
Cites Work
- Three ancient problems solved by using the game theory logic based on the Shapley value
- Some non-superadditive games, and their Shapley values, in the talmud
- The pseudo-average rule: bankruptcy, cost allocation and bargaining
- Transferable utility games with uncertainty
- Non-cooperative solutions for estate division problems
- The constrained equal awards rule for bankruptcy problems with a priori unions
- Parametric rationing methods
- Compromise solutions for bankruptcy situations with references
- A non-cooperative interpretation of the \(f\)-just rules of bankruptcy problems
- The minimal overlap rule revisited
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- Bargaining problems with claims
- Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Multi-issue allocation situations
- Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Rationing in the presence of baselines
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- Compromise solutions based on bankruptcy
- A geometric characterisation of the compromise value
- The core cover in relation to the nucleolus and the Weber set
- Updating claims in bankruptcy problems
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- Potential, Value, and Consistency
- A Simple Expression for the Shapley Value in a Special Case
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- HOW TO COPE WITH DIVISION PROBLEMS UNDER INTERVAL UNCERTAINTY OF CLAIMS?
- The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game
- The Bilateral Consistent Prekernel, the Core, and NTU Bankruptcy Problems
This page was built for publication: GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF BANKRUPTCY AND TAXATION PROBLEMS: RECENT ADVANCES