NONSTANDARD MODELS IN RECURSION THEORY AND REVERSE MATHEMATICS
DOI10.1017/bsl.2014.14zbMath1341.03098OpenAlexW2133902039MaRDI QIDQ2925331
Wei Li, Yue Yang, Chi Tat Chong
Publication date: 21 October 2014
Published in: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/f1fd417fbd9b4b12d21ab0648d85a3f695353c9b
survey papernonstandard modelsreverse mathematicsfragments of Peano arithmeticcombinatorial principlesRamsey's theorem for pairsreverse recursion theory
Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to mathematical logic and foundations (03-02) Foundations of classical theories (including reverse mathematics) (03B30) Second- and higher-order arithmetic and fragments (03F35) Nonstandard models in mathematics (03H05) Theory of numerations, effectively presented structures (03D45)
Related Items
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- \(\varPi^1_1\)-conservation of combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's theorem for pairs
- An easy priority-free proof of a theorem of Friedberg
- On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs
- The metamathematics of Stable Ramsey’s Theorem for Pairs
- Combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's Theorem for pairs
- On the role of the collection principle for Σ⁰₂-formulas in second-order reverse mathematics
- Reverse mathematics, computability, and partitions of trees
- The strength of the rainbow Ramsey Theorem
- Corrigendum to: “On the strength of Ramsey's Theorem for pairs”
- Bounding minimal pairs
- Recursively enumerable generic sets
- Working below a high recursively enumerable degree
- A cohesive set which is not high
- Random reals, the rainbow Ramsey theorem, and arithmetic conservation
- Reverse mathematics and Ramsey's property for trees
- Friedberg Numbering in Fragments of Peano Arithmetic and α-Recursion Theory
- The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy
- On suborderings of the α-recursively enumerable α-degrees
- Ramsey's theorem and recursion theory
- \(\Sigma_2\) induction and infinite injury priority arguments. III: Prompt sets, minimal pairs and Shoenfield's conjecture