Dilemmas and paradoxes: cycles in argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1093/logcom/exu011zbMath1354.68248DBLPjournals/logcom/Bench-Capon16OpenAlexW2112102618WikidataQ58168319 ScholiaQ58168319MaRDI QIDQ2957942

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon

Publication date: 31 January 2017

Published in: Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exu011

zbMATH Keywords

paradoxescyclesargumentationpreferred semanticsdilemmas

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Related Items (5)

Integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for quasi-convex functions with applications ⋮ Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules ⋮ Paracoherent Answer Set Semantics meets Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation ⋮ Structured argumentation dynamics. Undermining attacks in default justification logic

This page was built for publication: Dilemmas and paradoxes: cycles in argumentation frameworks