The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions

DOI10.1093/logcom/exu010zbMath1354.68247OpenAlexW2324054484MaRDI QIDQ2957948

Ringo Baumann, Stefan Woltran

Publication date: 31 January 2017

Published in: Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/5e1b824f799e089aa7385d58dc18fa01e228b742

zbMATH Keywords

equivalence relationsabstract argumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Related Items

Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility, On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation, An argumentation-based approach for identifying and dealing with incompatibilities among procedural goals, Approximating agreements in formal argumentation dialogues1, Open Problems in Abstract Argumentation, A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation