Conference Program Design with Single-Peaked and Single-Crossing Preferences
DOI10.1007/978-3-662-54110-4_16zbMath1406.91115OpenAlexW2559814211MaRDI QIDQ2959832
Laurent Gourvès, Jérôme Monnot, Dimitris Fotakis
Publication date: 10 February 2017
Published in: Web and Internet Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54110-4_16
facility locationutility functions\(\mathsf {NP}\)-hardnessChamberlin-Courant multi-winner electionconference program design
Utility theory (91B16) Individual preferences (91B08) Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17) Social choice (91B14)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- On the complexity of achieving proportional representation
- Precoloring extension on unit interval graphs
- The complexity of fully proportional representation for single-crossing electorates
- On the Computation of Fully Proportional Representation
- Manipulation of k-Approval in Nearly Single-Peaked Electorates
- A Constant Factor Approximation Algorithm for Fault-Tolerant k -Median
- On the Power of Deterministic Mechanisms for Facility Location Games
This page was built for publication: Conference Program Design with Single-Peaked and Single-Crossing Preferences