A comparison between hybrid methods: FEM-BEM versus FEM-DBCI

DOI10.1108/COMPEL-10-2012-0263zbMath1360.65271OpenAlexW2066111267MaRDI QIDQ2970648

Santi Agatino Rizzo, Giuseppe Borzì, Giovanni Aiello, Salvatore Alfonzetti, Nunzio Salerno

Publication date: 30 March 2017

Published in: COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/compel-10-2012-0263

zbMATH Keywords

finite element methodboundary element methodintegral equationsfinite element analysiselectrostaticsGMRES algorithmhybrid technique

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N30) Boundary element methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N38)

Related Items (1)

A comparison between hybrid methods: FEM-BEM versus FEM-DBCI

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• The random walk on the boundary method for calculating capacitance
• A comparison between hybrid methods: FEM-BEM versus FEM-DBCI
• A GMRES iterative solution of FEM‐BEM global systems in skin effect problems
• GMRES: A Generalized Minimal Residual Algorithm for Solving Nonsymmetric Linear Systems
• Infinite elements
• Charge iteration: A procedure for the finite element computation of unbounded electrical fields

This page was built for publication: A comparison between hybrid methods: FEM-BEM versus FEM-DBCI