Arguing with Valued Preference Relations

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_6zbMath1341.68214OpenAlexW166707677MaRDI QIDQ3011935

Christophe Labreuche, Souhila Kaci

Publication date: 29 June 2011

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_6

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items (5)

A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation ⋮ Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic ⋮ Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats ⋮ Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches ⋮ A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks
• Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning

This page was built for publication: Arguing with Valued Preference Relations