Arguing about the Trustworthiness of the Information Sources

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_7zbMath1341.68271OpenAlexW1777065279MaRDI QIDQ3011936

Guido Boella, Leendert van der Torre, Serena Villata, Dov M. Gabbay

Publication date: 29 June 2011

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/24966

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items (5)

A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation ⋮ A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory ⋮ Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations ⋮ Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Belief, information acquisition, and trust in multi-agent systems -- a modal logic formulation
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
• Metalevel argumentation
• Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: Arguing about the Trustworthiness of the Information Sources