Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_8zbMath1341.68235OpenAlexW194177591MaRDI QIDQ3011937

Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic

Publication date: 29 June 2011

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_8

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items (6)

Equivalence in logic-based argumentation ⋮ Integrating individual preferences into collective argumentation ⋮ Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats ⋮ Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences ⋮ A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks ⋮ Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

Cites Work

• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
• Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks

This page was built for publication: Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks