Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis

DOI10.1016/J.TPB.2015.10.006zbMath1343.92443OpenAlexW1901013115WikidataQ39494975 ScholiaQ39494975MaRDI QIDQ304435

Simon Maccracken Stump, Peter L. Chesson

Publication date: 25 August 2016

Published in: Theoretical Population Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2015.10.006

zbMATH Keywords

coexistencefitness-density covariancehabitat partitioningJanzen-Connell hypothesispredator partitioningspatial storage effect

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Population dynamics (general) (92D25)

Related Items (3)

How spatial structure and neighbor uncertainty promote mutualists and weaken black queen effects ⋮ How optimally foraging predators promote prey coexistence in a variable environment ⋮ Movement, competition and pattern formation in a two prey-one predator food chain model

Cites Work

• Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal?
• Coexistence of competitors in spatially and temporally varying environments: A look at the combined effects of different sorts of variability
• Multispecies competition in variable environments
• General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments.
• Interacting coexistence mechanisms in annual plant communities: frequency-dependent predation and the storage effect
• The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities

This page was built for publication: Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis