On two conjectures that shaped the historiography of indeterminate analysis: Strachey and Chasles on Sanskrit sources
From MaRDI portal
Publication:309803
DOI10.1016/j.hm.2016.04.001zbMath1348.01033OpenAlexW2342926453WikidataQ122910395 ScholiaQ122910395MaRDI QIDQ309803
Publication date: 7 September 2016
Published in: Historia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2016.04.001
Quadratic and bilinear Diophantine equations (11D09) History of number theory (11-03) History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55) History of Indian mathematics (01A32) Historiography (01A85)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- A forgotten British analyst: Nicolas Vilant (1737-1807)
- Writing the history of mathematics. Its historical development
- Fibonacci's \textit{Liber abaci}. A translation into modern English of Leonardo Pisano's \textit{Book of calculation}. Transl. from the Latin and with an introduction, notes and bibliography by L. E. Sigler
- The analytical society (1812-1813): Precursor of the renewal of Cambridge mathematics
- Rationale of the Chakravāla process of Jayadeva and Bhāskara II
- Geometry, analysis, and the baptism of slaves: John West in Scotland and Jamaica
- Geometry versus analysis in early 19th-century Scotland: John Leslie, William Wallace, and Thomas Carlyle
- History of classical Diophantine analysis. From Abū Kāmil to Fermat
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: On two conjectures that shaped the historiography of indeterminate analysis: Strachey and Chasles on Sanskrit sources
