On the necessity and design of studies comparing statistical methods

DOI10.1002/bimj.201700129zbMath1383.62019OpenAlexW2770322578WikidataQ48203098 ScholiaQ48203098MaRDI QIDQ3134251

Michał Abrahamowicz, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Harald Binder, Willi Sauerbrei

Publication date: 9 February 2018

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700129

zbMATH Keywords

comparisonevaluationsimulationsneutralitypublication practice

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundational topics in statistics (62A99)

Related Items (5)

Evaluation of approaches for accommodating interactions and non‐linear terms in multiple imputation of incomplete three‐level data ⋮ Adapting SIMEX to correct for bias due to interval‐censored outcomes in survival analysis with time‐varying exposure ⋮ Missing data imputation in clinical trials using recurrent neural network facilitated by clustering and oversampling ⋮ Over-optimistic evaluation and reporting of novel cluster algorithms: an illustrative study ⋮ Regularized target encoding outperforms traditional methods in supervised machine learning with high cardinality features

This page was built for publication: On the necessity and design of studies comparing statistical methods