Hybrid Reasoning on a Bipolar Argumentation Framework

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-35514-2_7zbMath1440.68267OpenAlexW2992977072MaRDI QIDQ3297805

Tatsuki Kawasaki, Sosuke Moriguchi, Kazuko Takahashi

Publication date: 20 July 2020

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35514-2_7

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationlegal reasoningbidirectional reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Knowledge representation (68T30)

Cites Work

• Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
• A logical framework for default reasoning
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Capturing bipolar argumentation in non-flat assumption-based argumentation
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
• Abduction in argumentation frameworks
• If Nothing Is Accepted -- Repairing Argumentation Frameworks
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Hybrid Reasoning on a Bipolar Argumentation Framework