What’s So Bad About Second-Order Logic?

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-18362-6_20zbMath1437.03034OpenAlexW961216607MaRDI QIDQ3299536

Jason Turner

Publication date: 23 July 2020

Published in: Synthese Library (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18362-6_20

zbMATH Keywords

continuum hypothesisontological commitmentepistemic obligationgenuine consequencetopic neutrality

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Higher-order logic (03B16)

Cites Work

• One true logic?
• Somehow things do not relate: on the interpretation of polyadic second-order logic
• Logical Pluralism
• Nominalism Through De‐Nominalization
• Completeness in the theory of types
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: What’s So Bad About Second-Order Logic?