Hybrid Elections Broaden Complexity-Theoretic Resistance to Control
DOI10.1002/malq.200810019zbMath1177.91066arXivcs/0608057OpenAlexW2037659828MaRDI QIDQ3392307
Edith Hemaspaandra, Hemaspaandra, Lane A., Jörg Rothe
Publication date: 14 August 2009
Published in: Mathematical Logic Quarterly (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0608057
complexitycomputational complexitymanipulabilitymulti-agent systemscomputational social choicepreference aggregationvoting system
Voting theory (91B12) Individual preferences (91B08) Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17) Social choice (91B14)
Related Items (20)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- The complexity of Kemeny elections
- Guarantees for the success frequency of an algorithm for finding Dodgson-election winners
- Approximability of Dodgson's rule
- Anyone but him: the complexity of precluding an alternative
- Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election
- Single transferable vote resists strategic voting
- How hard is it to control an election?
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- Extending Condorcet's rule
- Boolean operations, joins, and the extended low hierarchy
- Exact complexity of the winner problem for Young elections
- The computational difficulty of manipulating an election
- Strategic manipulability without resoluteness or shared beliefs: Gibbard-Satterthwaite generalized
- Hybrid Elections Broaden Complexity-Theoretic Resistance to Control
- Sincere-Strategy Preference-Based Approval Voting Fully Resists Constructive Control and Broadly Resists Destructive Control
- Bounded Query Classes
- Copeland Voting Fully Resists Constructive Control
- When are elections with few candidates hard to manipulate?
- Sincere-Strategy Preference-Based Approval Voting Broadly Resists Control
- Llull and Copeland Voting Computationally Resist Bribery and Constructive Control
- How Hard Is Bribery in Elections?
- Average Case Complete Problems
- Sparse Sets, Lowness and Highness
- The Boolean Hierarchy I: Structural Properties
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
- Exact analysis of Dodgson elections
- A Richer Understanding of the Complexity of Election Systems
- Algorithms and Computation
This page was built for publication: Hybrid Elections Broaden Complexity-Theoretic Resistance to Control