Abiotic and biotic interactions determine whether increased colonization is beneficial or detrimental to metapopulation management

DOI10.1016/J.TPB.2016.02.001zbMath1349.92131OpenAlexW2295383611WikidataQ40869149 ScholiaQ40869149MaRDI QIDQ341992

Michael A. McCarthy, Eve McDonald-Madden, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Sam Nicol, Darren M. Southwell, Kate J. Helmstedt

Publication date: 17 November 2016

Published in: Theoretical Population Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/106433/3/UQ388187_OA.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

predator-preyepidemiologymetapopulationcolonizationabiotic threatshost-pathogen

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Epidemiology (92D30) Population dynamics (general) (92D25)

Related Items (1)

Exploring artificial habitat fragmentation to control invasion by infectious wildlife diseases

Uses Software

• R

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Dilution versus facilitation: impact of connectivity on disease risk in metapopulations
• Habitat destruction in a simple predator-prey patch model: how predators enhance prey persistence and abundance
• Increased migration in host-pathogen metapopulations can cause host extinction
• The roles of spatial heterogeneity and adaptive movement in stabilizing (or destabilizing) simple metacommunities
• A fully coupled, mechanistic model for infectious disease dynamics in a metapopulation: movement and epidemic duration
• Persistence of an infectious disease in a subdivided population
• Divide and conquer? Persistence of infectious agents in spatial metapopulations of hosts
• How patch configuration affects the impact of disturbances on metapopulation persistence

This page was built for publication: Abiotic and biotic interactions determine whether increased colonization is beneficial or detrimental to metapopulation management