Using Journal Impact Factors to Correct for the Publication Bias of Medical Studies

DOI10.1111/J.1541-0420.2005.00513.XzbMath1127.62106OpenAlexW2059914970WikidataQ28200504 ScholiaQ28200504MaRDI QIDQ3436525

Dan Jackson, Rose D. Baker

Publication date: 11 May 2007

Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00513.x

zbMATH Keywords

stochastic modelmeta-analysisimpact factorevidence-based medicine

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Applications of statistics (62P99)

Related Items (4)

How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts? ⋮ The Significance Level of Meta-Regression's Standard Hypothesis Test ⋮ Meta‐Analysis of Studies with Missing Data ⋮ Assessing the Sensitivity of Meta-analysis to Selection Bias: A Multiple Imputation Approach

Cites Work

• Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis
• A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
• Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis

This page was built for publication: Using Journal Impact Factors to Correct for the Publication Bias of Medical Studies