A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXT010zbMath1323.68470DBLPjournals/logcom/PrakkenWBA15OpenAlexW2167543484WikidataQ57727122 ScholiaQ57727122MaRDI QIDQ3450203

Henry Prakken, Adam Wyner, Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon

Publication date: 3 November 2015

Published in: Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/feb8622c3569ae1e88a117a2ed5ee98cab83b4f8

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationlegal case-based reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Related Items (6)

Lakatos-style collaborative mathematics through dialectical, structured and abstract argumentation ⋮ A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument ⋮ Explainable AI tools for legal reasoning about cases: a study on the European court of human rights ⋮ Towards a principle-based approach for case-based reasoning ⋮ Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future ⋮ On searching explanatory argumentation graphs

This page was built for publication: A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+