A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests for 2x2 contingency tables

DOI10.1080/03610918708812633zbMath0695.62051OpenAlexW1968596575MaRDI QIDQ3471368

Michael Haber

Publication date: 1987

Published in: Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918708812633

zbMATH Keywords

binomial distributionFisher's exact testuniformly most powerful unbiased testspower comparisons

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Contingency tables (62H17)

Related Items

Optimal correction for continuity and conditions for validity in the unconditional chi-squared test ⋮ Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions ⋮ BayesianP-Values for Testing Independence in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables ⋮ On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2×2 contingency table: an overview of fisher's exact test and yates' correction for continuity ⋮ Resolving the conflict over fisher's exact test ⋮ Is Fisher's exact test very conservative? ⋮ Optimal testing strategies for large, sparse multinomial models ⋮ Determining the best test for the 2×2 comparative trial ⋮ Improvedp-Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions ⋮ Optimal Unconditional Asymptotic Test in 2 × 2 Multinomial Trials ⋮ Exact unconditional distributions for dichotomous data in many-to-one comparisons. ⋮ On determining the \(P\)-value in \(2\times 2\) multinomial trials ⋮ Optimal unconditional test in \(2\times 2\) multinomial trials ⋮ Asymptotical tests in \(2\times 2\) comparative trials: (unconditional approach).